ONE
distraught tunic. Does anyway: The HUGE society where…),
must be written elsewhere…),
must
be written elsewhere m&w status/attributes,
(so which,
$ —>
effect?) (a
ward
against that
type of man.) (Perhaps the thing—we’ve resigned
ourselves as the monastic social mover,
major
reeling about their physical
striation, internal/etc. “Blue/white collar,”
$
of clothing
black tshirt, boot
cut denim jeans, corset, girdle. (Please not. How does
this relate… are you freed of ourselves
in the
monastic social/social thought
it does
anyway: The
se
written elsewhere m&w
start
over, the
“welcome lie” of
here: supra.
TWO
trapped? Does it serve or
quantify & identify & identify
& identify & identify
&
identify & identify &
identify &
identify & identify
& identify &
identify
& identify & identify
&
identify
&
identify & identify & identify &
identify
& identify &
identify
&
identify & identify &
identify
& identify
&
identify
& identify
&
identify
& identify
& identify
& identify
&
identify & identify & identify & identify
& identify & identify & identify & identify &
identify
&
identify &
identify
& identify & identify
& identify &
identify & identify
& identify &
identify & identify
& identify
& identify & identify &
THREE
enhances
always
wears a black tshirt, the monastic
social
though
of thoughts seemingly noble cause accoutrement. I’m
the thing
in black tshirt, their
physical estranges in
the
monastic protein straction
with
REAL BIOLOGICAL IMPERATIVE.
(∴Terrorism
is
a vis a vis a vis a vis a vis
a
vis a vis a
vis a
vis
a
ward against that which reflects change
of suit, boot cut denim
jeans, convers
present
of
here…), must
be written
elsewhere…),
must be
written elsewhere…),
must be written elsewhere?
supra-fashion”
freed or
fought? Does
anyway: The
aped: Does thinking a ward
against that reflect —>
What
reflects
ch ch ch
FOUR
against
that reflect change quantify & identify & identify
will ever
choose
to some lie
of death. (?) (a
ward against that reflection of objects changed? Basic society
where from supra-fashio” free us
or
trap us in ourself Does
to
my relation
to
always wear a
black tshirt, themselves in
(a percent of a homogenous, monastic occupation
in their physical straight tunic. Does anything about the world;
my initial though: it
does this relation internal $ of here…), must
be
written
elsewhere…), must
be written
elsewhere…), must
be written
elsewhere? supra-fashion?) (a ward to
define the
monastic social thought
it
is a
vis
a vis ward against the positive
FIVE
play against
that
it does
that for
men.) (Perhaps this relation,/internal/
collar,”
$ of
clothing,
supra-fashion?)
(6?) that for men,
the point to
define? + bands
of G4
will ever,
the “welcome lie” of G4
choose
to define
the
monastic social thought how other my relation!
A distractions 1,2&3 (theoretical stations with
REAL BIOLOGICAL IMPERATIVE.
∴ Terrorism is to this
relational collar of
the choice
to define themselves
to define
bands of
a homogenous,
monastic social stranger
